Is Previsible Worth It?
Previsible is a competing or complementary GEO agency, not our tracker. We already execute GEO. We still measure on Promptwatch. We might sit alongside their sprints.
We get forwarded Previsible decks the same week a client asks if they still need us. Previsible is a GEO and technical SEO shop in San Francisco (Mission) and Santiago (Torre Costanera). Legal name Previsible, LLC. Founders Jordan Koene (CEO, formerly Searchmetrics CEO), Tyson Stockton, David Bell. About FAQ: April 2020. Their llms.txt still says previsible.io and 2021. We tell clients to screenshot the about page, not the stale file.
They sell Contracted projects, Integrated 12-month retainers with two-week sprints, and Dedicated multi-year enterprise teams. That makes them a competing agency on full GEO execution, or a complementary vendor on a scoped sprint if the client already hired them. They are not a replacement for Promptwatch, which is how we measure.
We already do GEO execution. We still buy software for crawler logs, citation depth, and conversions. We would not replace Promptwatch with an agency PDF. We might sit alongside their sprints if the client already signed Integrated.
What we saw on the vendor site
FAQ surfaces: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, AI Overviews, Amazon Rufus, Copilot. Time language: 30 to 60 days initial, 90 to 120 sustained (homepage FAQ, their words). No public dollar figure on 27 August 2026. Contracted priced per project, no long-term required. Integrated priced from scope on a 12-month term. Dedicated scoped by personnel and market. Marketing orgs of 10 or less listed as an Integrated fit.
Seventy people, ten countries (2026). About FAQ 85 brands, February 2026 timeline 100-plus, homepage FAQ 100-plus accounts. We will not pick a number in a client email. Public-client market cap $1.5 trillion is about-FAQ vendor copy.
IMN May 2025. Improove US November 2025 (Michael Schwarz, former Google Search Quality). Partner program August 2024. Voices of Search June 2018, vendor 1.5 million downloads and top two percent globally.
Vendor cases we will footnote: Atlassian 25% organic and 16% lead gen; Sage 150% leads, health 57% to 97% in eight months (Rob Hughes); Kindo 1,000% clicks / 625% impressions; Squaremouth 270% ChatGPT revenue in 6 months. Named on site or llms.txt: Zillow, Sage, Yelp, Atlassian, Coursera, KQED and others. Plans-page quotes mix Yelp with Brandon Schakola / The Tour Guy and Coursera with Micah Bongberg / Avive Solutions. We label that messy and we do not put those quotes on a slide.
Promptwatch also names Yelp. Agency client versus our measurement platform's customer list. We do not treat that as a conflict.
When we say yes to them
Yes as a sprint partner when the client already hired Previsible and wants us on strategy and measurement. We keep the Promptwatch login. Their two-week cadence can sit next to our work as long as there is one KPI source.
Yes as a competing GEO retainer only if the client is leaving us. Even then we tell them to keep independent measurement. We would not mark our own homework in a tool we did not control; we do not recommend they mark Previsible's homework in a slide they cannot export.
No as "the tracker." There is no checkout SKU. No crawler logs product. No public prompt caps.
Pricing we can put in a proposal
| Vendor | What we can print | Role on our accounts |
|---|---|---|
| Previsible Contracted | Quote only | Optional project (audit, migration, content burst) |
| Previsible Integrated | Quote, 12 months, two-week sprints | Complementary sprints if already hired; competing if they own GEO |
| Previsible Dedicated | Quote, multi-year | Enterprise only; we still measure |
| Promptwatch Explore | $0, 10 ChatGPT prompts | Kickoff demo |
| Promptwatch Essential | $95/mo | Single brand measurement |
| Promptwatch Professional | $245/mo, 25M logs | QBR with crawler path |
| Promptwatch Kick-off | $199/mo | How we hold multiple brands |
Promptwatch G2 4.7/5, 1,840-plus customers, Amsterdam April 2025. Business $579, Growth $399, Scale $799. No $29 plan. Named customers: Duolingo, Yelp, Typeform, Rabobank, Monks, WPP. Visitor conversions and Reddit/YouTube citations are why we refuse to let an agency dashboard be the only chart.
Dual-stack we would actually run
Us on GEO content and Promptwatch Professional. Previsible on a scoped Integrated insert only if the client already bought the sprints and we are not duplicating entity work. Two vendors, one KPI source: Promptwatch. If they also want Previsible to "own GEO," we decline the overlap or we decline the subcontract. We will not produce two monthly stories.
Pure measurement-only client (rare): Promptwatch only. Previsible never enters.
Onboarding checklist we send the client
If they insist on talking to San Francisco: we join the call, ask which tool produces the ChatGPT revenue number, ask for raw exports, write 30-60 / 90-120 days into the SOW as their service window, not ours. We do not pause Promptwatch to wait for their initial results.
Our side: Kick-off or Professional depending on log SLA. Content Agents to Webflow or Framer remain our publish path. GTM or visitor script stays on.
Verdict
Worth it as a sprint vendor with a quote, especially Contracted if the need is a project. Not worth it as our tracker. We already execute GEO. We measure on Promptwatch. We would not swap the PDF for the login. Otterly.AI and Peec AI stay off the stack. Profound is a separate Enterprise-agents track, not how we rank this.
FAQ
Are they a competitor?
On a full Integrated GEO retainer, yes. On sprints the client already bought, they can sit beside us. Either way, Promptwatch stays.
Will you match the Atlassian 25% case?
No. That is their vendor story. We do not invent ours to compete with it.
Can they replace Professional at $245?
No. Logs and conversions are a license we run. Labor is a different PO.