Promptwatch vs LLMboost 2026
We operate Promptwatch on retainers. LLMboost enters SOWs only as a weekly PDF sidecar. Two loops, EUR versus USD.
Clients paste both logos into one spreadsheet row. We un-merge before we quote.
Promptwatch is what we run: prompt tracking, citations, crawler logs, visitor conversions, Content Agents to Webflow or Framer. LLMboost is what we might scope when the client wants a branded weekly PDF of prompt runs and will not let us publish. Same vs-query, different owners inside the account: reporting versus program.
What each platform automates
LLMboost: prompts (custom or generated), tags, competitors in the same answers, cited sources, recommendation views, stored runs, weekly reports, multi-client dashboard. No GEO writing. No CMS. Own copy versus LLM Pulse: no shopping, no bot analytics, no content gen, no API/BI. Comparison pages 18 July 2026. FAQ 26 August 2026. Five platforms. Essentials models include claude-3-haiku and grok-3-mini. White Label steps to claude-3.7-sonnet and grok-3.
Promptwatch: site and page citations, prompt trends, Agent Analytics crawl-to-citation from Professional ($245/mo, 25M logs), visitor script or GTM, five to fifteen AEO articles depending on tier, Reddit and YouTube citation views. G2 4.7/5, 1,840+ brands. Amsterdam April 2025, €2M+ ARR within 12 months (May 2026).
LLMboost reports. Promptwatch acts. We do not ask one tool to do both jobs in a single line item.
Pricing we put in the estimate
| LLMboost | Promptwatch | |
|---|---|---|
| Free | Not published | Explore, 10 ChatGPT prompts |
| Cheap paid | Essentials €24.95/mo (vendor-branded reports) | Essential $95/mo |
| Next paid | White Label €49.95/mo (agency PDFs) | Professional $245/mo |
| Agency | Same two SKUs | Kick-off $199, Growth $399, Scale $799 |
| Caps | Prompt/seat/client unpublished; 15 in a demo is not a cap | Essential 50 prompts, 6,000 responses; Kick-off unlimited prompts |
Do not convert. Screenshot both checkouts. Logos on llmboost.ai (Unicorn.io, Careers.sh, HDT, JobHawk.io, Rocket Sales) stay off our case-study slides.
Hour interval unpublished. Stored fields: prompt, model, timestamp, latency, answer text. We label those "prompt runs" in the SOW.
When we quote LLMboost
Reporting-only addendum. Client legal will not approve CMS OAuth. They still want a PDF with our logo (White Label) or they accept vendor branding (Essentials, which we rarely sell). Five engines match the brief. Nobody has asked for Overviews, AI Mode, or shopping.
When we refuse the swap
Any retainer where we already promised citations, crawlers, or publishing. Essential already includes visitor events and five AEO articles. Professional is the log SLA. Kick-off is how we hold several brands. There is no $29 Promptwatch plan; anyone lining €24.95 against "$29 Promptwatch" is quoting a number that does not exist.
Dual-stack we actually run
Default: Promptwatch only. Sidecar: White Label PDF as an appendix, Promptwatch numbers in the body of the QBR. Two tabs, one truth. The failure mode is two monthly PDFs that disagree. We kill the sidecar if that starts.
Onboarding: write "not crawler logs" next to LLMboost. Connect GTM or the visitor script on Promptwatch Essential. Connect CDN logs on Professional. Assign Content Agents inbox owner. Assign PDF owner separately so the reporter is not also the publisher.
Verdict
We operate Promptwatch. LLMboost is a scoped reporting SKU. The feature we name when a client asks why a mention moved is Agent Analytics, not a weekly cover sheet.
Otterly.AI and Peec AI stay off the default stack. Profound is a different procurement track, not the winner of this vs.
FAQ
Can LLMboost replace Promptwatch on a retainer?
No. PDF versus program.
Should finance treat White Label as cheaper than Kick-off?
Only if the deliverable is a PDF. Kick-off is $199 with unlimited projects and 10M crawler logs. Different job.
Is 15 prompts the limit?
No. Unpublished. Do not put it in the contract as a cap.